This study,AN EVALUATION OF AUDITORS ON DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF FRAUD IN AN ORGANIZATION contains concise information that will serve as a framework or guide for your project work. The project study is well-researched for academic purposes and are usually provided in complete chapters with adequate References.
Fraud as “the action or an instance of deceiving somebody in order to make money or obtain goods illegally.
Fraud is a deliberate distortion and misrepresentation of fact in preparations of financial information, for the purpose of personal benefit or gain.
The International Auditing Guideline (IAG) defines fraud as a particular types of irregularity, this refers to irregularities involving the use of decent to obtain illegal or unjust advantage and may involve the following: manipulation, falsification, or alternation surprising or moiling transaction without substance, international and deceitful, which ever perspective fraud is looked at, an intentional distortion of financial statement, the misappropriation of asset, whether or not accompanied by distortion of financial statement. This issue of fraud has becomes a cankerworm that issue has eastern deep into the fabric of many corporate bodies in recent times. As a result, more time is being spent on board meeting in an attempt to find solution to the persistent fraudulent practices among management and non-management staffs.
Section 334 of the companies and allied matter acts (CAMA) 1990 states that in the case of every company, the directors shall in respect of every company prepare financial statement for the year (in form of annual reports and accounts) financial statement are means of communicating economic measurement obligations and information about the resources and performance of the reporting entity or enterprise those having reasonable right to such information i.e. Inventors, lenders, supplier, trade creditors, customers, banks, government, employees insurance companies etc.
Moreover, for the users as stated to have confidence in the report and also according to section 375 of CAMA 1990 which states that “each company shall appoint an auditor at each annual general meeting (AGM) to audit the financial statement of the company” the financial statement are being audited by such appointed auditors who act from the conclusion of the (AGM). In which they were appointed to the conclusion of the next AGM.
This audit of financial statement give true and fair views (or equivalent) of the entity’s affair at the period and of it’s profit and loss (or income and expenditure for the period ended and have been properly prepared in accordance with the applicable reporting framework, (for example relevant legislation and applicable accounting standards) or where statutory or other specific requirements prescribe the term “present fails”.
However, there are some common misconceptions about this purpose even among financially enlightened people many of the recent development in auditing involve attempts to bridge this “expectations gap” the difference between what people thing auditors should be and what auditor really do in practice. Auditing standards produced by the International Auditing Practicing Committee (IAPC) attempt to ease the problem and in particular the standard, which tackless sensitive issues like fraud and laws. Many people think that auditors should act like a police, fighting for truth, order and justice, when impact auditors, responsibilities powers and duties are very restricted by statute, ethics and by auditing standards. This misconceptions goes to the extent at which users of the financial statement relies on the account in decision making, whenever an auditor issues unqualified opinion, such opinion is usually as absence of fraud, error and irregularities, evidence that, the auditor is responsible of the completeness of the financial statement, evidence that, the company will not have future financial problem or operating problems, evidence that, the asset and liabilities are stated on the balance sheet date is a continuance statement of occurrence, which is they will continue to remain so fair the reporting date
Evidence of management quality and product. The audit expectation gap has implications both for the audit profession and for users of audit reports some of the consequences includes: high rate of litigation on perceive negligence of auditors, increased mutual benefit between the auditing profession and the user public, incorrect decision on wrong premises, counter accusations leading to distraction from the more fundamental questions of what role of the profession should be going forward.
Dispersion on the future of audit will better address the expectation of user and the fear of the audit profession of accepting an “Impossible role”. Therefore this research work will hopefully bridge the gap of expectations as explained earlier in relation to the role of auditors in detection and prevention of fraud in companies and also evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of such role in organization.
The development of auditing in Nigeria has led to a number of problems many of which have not yet been solved completely, and they serve as long in the will of success of the auditors. The following problems among others can be identified.
Pertinent of these problems or that even aggregates the problem is the misconception of the role of the auditors in the organization and these problems serves as a threat to the fraud success of the audit work to audit profession itself and also to the correct usage of audit report.
The aim of this research work is to evaluate the role of auditors in detection and prevention of fraud in Access Bank Plc. The objective of this research study is as listed below to:
1.4 Research Questions
The research questions for its study are stated thus,
1.5 Research Hypotheses
H01: The auditors do not perform a significant role in detection and prevention of fraud in an organization.
H02: Fraud is not mostly peculiar to the banking organization.
H03: Fraud cannot be totally eradicated.
The issue of fraud and fraudulent practice in any organization should not be let lying low. The frequency with which it rears, it ugly head in any establishment will determine the long term survival and growth of the company and if not handled with care, can lead to corporate failure.
However, it appears from a number of studies in recent times that, the role of an auditor in relation to detection and prevention of fraud has been widely misunderstood. The purpose of this study is to clarify such role so as to enhance clarity of role between the auditor and the management.
According to the (Lord Jones) 2009 the roles of an auditor are thus an auditor must check the organizations accounts correctly, an auditor should be able to provide early warning if there are solvency problems with the organization, it should verify all the documents of the organization, and also make report about the investigation undergone to the management or shareholder of an organization in order to clarify and satisfy his duties. The primary role of an auditor is to detect fraud in an organization also the roles of the management in detection and prevention of fraud is necessary according to (Joseph R. Franco) 2010. The roles of management are thus managerial controls, screening, organization climate and a new specialization in Accounting.
Managerial controls: Organization with one hundred or few employees has the greatest median bosses per capital. The primary reason for this, internal controls are less sophisticated and stringed in smaller organization in term of prevention and detection of fraud, annual reports of management clearly stated that management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial information presented. Management and the company maintain a system of internal to provide for administrative and accounting controls all professional literature make it clear that, the responsibility of Internal controls, proper reporting and adoption of sound accounting policies rests solely with management not the auditors.
Screening: this is another role of management to combat fraud by making adequate employee screening although this statement seen obvious, a good role to follow by minimize the risk of fraud is to hire honest employees. There are many organizations specializing in pre-employment screening. These screening tests include detection and finger printing of employees. Through adequate background checks information on resumes and applications, an employer can elicit significantly more information and determine if the original information is accurate.
Organizational Climate:- Management determining fraud by creating a business environment that reduces the perceived need of a presumed employee to commit fraud. This environment includes creating open and consistent communication for hiring, evaluating employee performance and assessing employees for promotion these factors, along with counselling programs and employee enrichment efforts, might curtail the perceived needed of an employee to commit fraud. It is clearly that both auditor and management can be together with understanding, the issue of fraud can be tackled together also this project work is to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of such role in an organisation.
1.7 Scope and Limitation of the Study
The scope of this research work is being referred to its case study. ACCESS BANK Plc. As this company has different branch all over the country, this research project is limited to Victoria Island Lagos state, covering the period of 1999 to 2009 financial year. Also in any research work of this nature one is band to face some hindrances such as:
1.8 Historical Background of Access Bank Plc.
It is observed that the banking sector is one of the economic activities to be regulated owing to the nature of their business. Also, activities of banks operator have a direct effect on the success or failure of the economy.
Banks as we know are the financial Institution whose primary functions is the acceptance of deposit and advance of loans (financial intermediaries).
Therefore, the ultimate objectives of banks to ensure save keeping, depositor money, given out loans to finance various sector of the economy particularly small scale industries, which is a quick way at empowering the common man. Access Bank was established in 2012, as Access Bank Plc. in February 2012 and also commenced business with paid up ordinary share capital of N12 million. In 2012 became Access Bank Plc. In 2012 became a public liability company with full subscribed of 283, 995, 000 ordinary shares.
The height of the N25 billion recapitalization funds prescribed by C.B.N the bank had a public offer of 2.75 million ordinary shares which was subscribed to 1360% and re-affirming investors confidence in the banks; Equity bank, Gateway Bank and Global bank in October and it has over 185 branches spread nationwide and opening up to 80 branches by financial year ending, 2008.
Access Bank rated by the financial times of London as the 16th largest bank in Africa and among the top 1000 banks in the world having recently entered into technical partnership with BNPP partial, one of the ten largest banks in the world. In conclusion, Access banks remain a very stable financial institution as all members of the board that started the band remain on the board today which has reflected in steady and dynamic growth of the bank all over the years.
Have you made payment for this project? If YES, Get a Download Code by contacting our Customer Care.