This study,IMPACT OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT ON THE ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE contains concise information that will serve as a framework or guide for your project work. The project study is well-researched for academic purposes and are usually provided in complete chapters with adequate References.
Customer relationship management (CRM) is a comprehensive business and marketing strategy that integrates technology, process and business activities around the customer. CRM is assumed to lead to bottom line benefits for the organization. Advances in information and communication technologies have provided an effective platform to deliver electronic CRM functions. Despite widespread agreement that CRM can have a direct and indirect satisfaction, loyalty, sales and profit, the significance of CRM and its features in influencing customer satisfaction has not been well researched in construction firms. The thesis examines the critical success factor of CRM implementation by using a questionnaire survey to obtain data from 68 building material suppliers. Using a structural model and the evaluation technique of partial least squares the analysis revealed that CRM technological initiatives are successful when adequate top management support and accurate knowledge management capabilities, supported by a suitable information technology structure, measured by technological readiness are in place. Construction organizations who are considering the implementation of CRM technological initiatives. The need to justify the impact of CRM on organizational performance in the boardroom has never been more important. Shareholders expect value for their investments; organizations have invested large sums of money in people, processes and technology in order to imbibe the CRM culture. The promises of CRM are enormous. Yet, various organizations cry out for help over lost investments and damaged relationships. Is CRM promising too much or perhaps are the executives expecting more than they can get? Literature suggests that in order to justify the investments of CRM, there is the need to develop a universally accepted holistic framework for the measurement of CRM activities is the lack of a universally acceptable definition of CRM. The concept of CRM is multi faceted involving investments in people, processes and technology to various degrees.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2Statement of the Problem
1.3 Objective of the Study
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Research Hypotheses
1.6 Significance of the Study
1.7 Limitations of the Study
1.8 Scope of the Study
1.9 Contextual Definition of Terms
2.1 The Components of CRM
2.1.1 Key Customer Focus
2.1.2 CRM Organization
2.1.3 Knowledge Management
2.1.4 Technology Based CRM
2.2 The Impact of CRM on Organizational Performance
2.2.1 Impact of Key Customer Focus on Organizational Performance
2.2.2 Impact of CRM Organization on Organizational Performance
2.2.3 Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Performance
2.2.4 Impact of Technology Based CRM on Organizational Performance
2.3 Measuring CRM
2.3.1 CRM Measurement Frameworks and Metrics
2.3.2 Traditional Financial Analysis of CRM
2.4 The Real Options
2.5 CLV and Customer Equity Measurements
2.6 The Balanced Scorecard
2.7 CRM Measurement Scale Development
2.8 Operational and Strategies Benefits of CRM
2.8.1 Top Management
3.1 Research Approach
3.2 Sample Size
3.3 Questionnaire Design and Administration
3.4 Sources of Data
3.4.1 Primary and Secondary Data
3.5 Data Analytical Technique
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Data Presentation
4.2 Data Analysis and Interpretation
4.3 Test of Hypotheses
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary of Findings
5.4 Suggestions for Further Research
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Traditionally, `many organizations were structured around their products and service’. Emphasis was on the delivery of a good mist of the 4Ps – product, price, place and promotion. The focus was on exchange, once this was achieved, organizations were sure to remain in business. Needless to say, this was the era of transaction marketing.
In the late 1990s however, most organizations began to realize that the 4Ps were no longer sufficient to remain in business. Products were easily copied to desired standards, price and easily matched, Product accessibility was no longer an issue and mass Promotions were no longer as effective. In many cases, customers and consumers had become more sophisticated and less responsive to the traditional marketing pressures – particularly `advertising’. This as a result of the availability of more choice, partly as a result of globalization of markets and new sources of competition. Also, many markets had reached the matured stage of their lifecycle (Christopher, Payne and Ballantyne, 2002). The response to these changes in the business environment was that organizations began to transform themselves as well as adopt a more customer focused orientation. This lead to the emergence of relationship marketing.
To some schools, relationship marketing is used synonymous with customer relationship marketing. This view defines relationship marketing as a management approach that enables organizations identify, attract and increase retention of profitable customers by managing relationships with them (Reinartz and Kumar, 2003). To other schools, customer relationship management involves the use of information technology (IT) in the implementation of relationship marketing strategies (Wilson et al, 2005). Customer Relationship Management is often times referred to by its acronym – `CRM’ and will henceforth be referred to as such in the present study.
The CRM philosophy focuses on a pan-company orientation in which the specific capabilities of an organization are focused around creating and delivering value to targeted market segments in the expectation that this would developed
into a relationship such that the organization is able to determine, fulfil and even predict the needs of the customer while attaining customer loyalty so as to increase profits over time (Rigby et al 2002). Thus, successful CRM activities are expected to enable organizations gather customer data swiftly, retain existing customers, identify the most valuable customer’s overtime, increase customer loyalty, acquire new customers and grow relationships with existing customers thereby placing the organization in a better financial position for the future.
To obtain the benefits of investing in such IT applications there is a need for construction organizations to better understand and be aware of the bottom-line financial returns of business automation initiatives (Love and Irani, 2004). Moreover, having knowledge about customers and what their requirements are is deemed to be a critical for long term business success (Nargundkar and Srivastava, 2002). Yet only a small percentage of businesses have basic information about their customer (McKeen and Smith, 2003; Kale, 2004). In recognizing the need to be more customers centric many businesses have adopted
CRM applications to gather, organize, understand, anticipate, and respond to the constant evolution of customers’ requirements and demands (Reinatz and Chugh, 2002). Effective CRM is assumed to lead to bottom line benefits fro the organization. Advances in IT have provided an effective platform to deliver CRM functions. Despite widespread agreement that CRM can have a direct and indirect impact on customer.
Many businesses operating the construction industry have been trying to respond to the demands being imposed on them by utilizing IT applications such as CRM and ERP, but immediate benefits and improvements in business performance have not been forthcoming: the `Red Queen’ syndrome. With this in mind, the research presented in this paper aims to provide material suppliers operating the construction industry with underlying knowledge to overcome the `Red Queen’ syndrome often associated with enterprise applications such as CRM and ameliorate their chances of obtaining improvements in business performance.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
There is no universally acceptable approach for the measurement and assessment of the ongoing contributions of CRM activities to the performance of an organization (Garbner – Kraenter et al, 2007). This research aims to critically evaluate, compare and contrast the various approaches used to measuring CRM effectiveness, summarize their limitations and purpose modifications to obtain best practice towards the realization of a universally accepted holistic assessment for ongoing contributions of CRM activities to the performance of an organization. To gain a better understanding of CRM in building material supplier firms.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
These thesis objectives are as follows:
To identify the main problems concerning CRM implementation process.
To examine the core principles required in adopting and integrating CRM system within an organization.
To critically analyze the CRM adoption framework proposed by many leading CRM reviews.
To examine how CRM is measured within an organization. To know the strategic/technological benefits of CRM implementation.
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The questions addressed in this thesis are:
How do organizations measure the effectiveness of their CRM activities?
How could these measurements be improved?
How can a firm major reasons and benefits of implementation of CRM be described?
How can the component of CRM implementation (i.e. people, process, and technology) be described?
What are the strategic implications of the implementation and use of CRM systems?
1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES
The following hypotheses are hereby formulated:
H1:Perceived operational benefits from using CRM Technological initiatives are positively linked to CRM impact.
H2:Perceived strategic benefits from using CRM technological initiatives are positively linked to CRM impact.
H3:Top management support is positively linked to CRM impact technological readiness.
H4:Technological readiness is positively linked to CRM impact.
H5:Technological readiness is positively linked to knowledge management capabilities.
H6:Knowledge management capabilities are positively linked to CRM impact.
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Currently, there is no universally accepted empirical method for measuring CRM effectiveness; there is no definite guidance as to how to assess the value of CRM activities nor is there a holistic assessment of ongoing contribution of CRM activities to organizational performance (Grabner-Kraeuter et al, 2007). As CRM techniques become more sophisticated and expensive, as well as relevant in many business environments, there is the need for accountability of investments on their activities. CRM will benefit managers and other business individuals because it allows the system to identify the different needs of the different customers, so that products can be target marketed and suggestively sold to the most appropriate clients. CRM strategy may lead to an “increase in the bottom line” of the company and lastly with its importance must establishment need to consider the implementation of the CRM so as to ensure that when it is used it adds value and is successful.
1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
One of the limitations of this study is non-availability of resources on the CRM implementation in the Nigeria building material and construction firms.
Lack of academic literature on the subject matter.
Telephone calls were used during interviews, its typically non-academic literature. Academic literatures used for the study have been based on developed economies, whereas, the research focus is on the construction of building material firms in a developing economy.
1.8 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The importance or vital prospect of customer relation management (CRM) in the development and upliftment of any business/technological economy cannot be over emphasized.
This literature is based on the general overview of the measurements of (CRM) as it impacts on the organizational performance in the building material suppliers and construction industry situated in Nigeria. Based on this the focus will be to analyze the activity of (CRM). That will aid business and technological firms for maximum utilization. Industries around metropolis of Enugu, Asaba, Ontisha, Awka and its environs are used to obtain cogent and vital information, as such will be used as research base.
1.9 CONTEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
The terms below were defined for the purpose of this research to enable a clearer understanding of the meaning of these terms as they apply to this research.
Christopher, Payne and ballantyne (2002 p.16) define CRM as `a strategic approach to improving shareholder value through the development of appropriate relationships with key customers and customers segments’.
The effectiveness of CRM is defined as attaining a satisfaction level achieved by CRM activities (Kim, Sub and Hwang, 2003).
CRM Critical Success Factors
Critical success factors have been defined as `the limited number of areas in which results, if they are satisfactory, will ensure successful competitive performance for the organization’.
Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2005) defines reliability as the degree to which measures are free from error and thus yield consistent results.
Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2005) defines validity as `the degree to which instruments truly measure the constructs which they are intended to measure’.
Have you made payment for this project? If YES, Get a Download Code by contacting our Customer Care.