A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH)

 3,000

Description

RESEARCH INFORMATION

[icon type=”icon-pencil”]: A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH)
[icon type=”icon-book”]: Chapter 1 – 5
[icon type=”icon-book-open”]: 49 Pages
[icon type=”icon-basket”]: #3, 000
[icon type=”icon-doc-line”]: Ms Word format

This study,A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH) contains concise information that will serve as a framework or guide for your project work. The project study is well-researched for academic purposes and are usually provided in complete chapters with adequate References.

Keywords:A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH)


RESEARCH BODY

ABSTRACT

Language is an integral part of our socio-cultural heritage that serves as the primary medium of communication for mankind. Pragmatics evolved to drill out meanings and to give interpretations to utterances beyond what is literarily said. This research work was carried out in order to give light to political interviews and to bring out meanings that are embedded in utterances made by politicians. One of the Nigerian daily newspapers was used, THE PUNCH, and 8 interviews were selected from this newspaper. From the data analysis presented in the research work, it has been discovered that politicians present their interviews or responses in a way that will make the masses to give their responses different meanings. The study shows that the application of pragmatic approach has really account for the meaning of utterances in context, especially in interviews.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE                                                                                                                            

1.1     GENERAL  INTRODUCTION

1.2      PURPOSE OF STUDY

1.3      JUSTIFICATION

1.4      SCOPE OF THE STUDY

1.5      RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER TWO

2.0      INTRODUCTION                                                     –

2.1      HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATICS

2.2      WHAT IS PRAGMATICS                                       –

2.3      THEORIES OF PRAGMATICS-

2.3.1   J.L. AUSTIN’S THEORY OF PRAGMATICS (1962)

2.3.2 J. SEARLE’S THEORY OF PRAGMATICS (1969)

2.3.3 H. P GRICE’S THEORY OF PRAGMATICS (1975)

2.3.4 KENT BACH & ROBERT HARNISH (1979)

2.3.5 E. ADEGBIJA’S THEORY OF PRAGMATICS (1982)

2.3.6. BAYO LAWAL’S THEORY OF PRAGMATICS (1997)

2.4      PRAGMATICS ELEMENTS

2.4.1 CONTEXT

2.4.2. PRESUPPOSITION

2.4.3 PARTICIPANTS

2.4.4   TOPIC

2.4.5 INFERENCE

2.4.6 REFERENCE

2.5      THE PRAGMATIC OF POLITICS

2.6. HISTORY OF THE PUNCH NEWSPAPER

CHAPTER THREE

3.0      INTRODUCTION

3.1   TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF DATA

CHAPTER FOUR

4.1      INTRODUCTION

4.2      SUMMARY

4.3      FINDINGS

4.4      CONCLUSION

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Language is an instrument of thought or concept which gives clear and vivid meaning of human expression for the purpose of human interaction. In any speech community, if there must be interaction, language must be in use. Human language is said to be communicative when language users are able to use words as appropriate to context. Quirk (1962, P.42) sees language as a “human instrument of expression through sounds as released by vocal chord’s

Language then can be seen as a phenomenon that makes other human activities possible. Again, language could be seen as a tangible manifestation of human thoughts, an outward expression of man’s feelings and ideas, etc. These form the basis of interaction in a speech community which aids communication. So, the desire to achieve communicative competence in a language or the quest for how language functions meaningfully prompted the evolution of pragmatic analysis.

Interactionally, language helps to establish and sustain social ties. Man does not only have to keep his relationship with other men alive for the survival of the social system, but he has to use language in achieving this desire. Conversation is one of the ways of doing this. It is thus important to study conversation because it is so central to human interaction. One approach to study conversation is the pragmatic approach.

Pragmatics deals with meaning in utterances and the interpretation of conversation to bring out the meanings that are not decoded by hearers. To fully understand meaning in utterances, we use the pragmatic approach. This approach allows the total context of a discourse to be understood and therefore enhances meaning decoding and an identification of the intention of a speaker.

Interviews are a form of conversation. To understand interview, especially political interviews, it will be interesting to bring in pragmatic in the analysis for better understanding. Interviews are regarded as a journalistic art and pragmatic analysis which focuses on the way we produce and understand language in context of a speech situation, reveals for example, that interviewers construct their questions carefully to place politicians in a dangerous position in such a way that they tend to dodge or give indirect answers to the questions.

In this research work, pragmatic analysis will be used to examine some of these interviews.

 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this research work is to find out how interviews can be understood more effectively and how encoded information can be decoded by readers using the pragmatic approach. Interviews are sometimes interpreted wrongly and the consequence is communication breakdown as each person tries to give a different interpretation to the same interview. A pragmatic analysis is expected to solve this problem.

1.3    JUSTIFICATION

The researcher sees the pragmatic approach as an approach that is capable of decoding particular factors that are peculiar in political interviews and this is why the researcher finds it imperative to use pragmatic theory and its elements in the analysis of political interviews. This will bring out decoded facts from utterances and it will help those who intend to research on political interviews using pragmatic theory to have more understanding about the research work.

1.4    SCOPE OF THE STUDY                              

The Study is embarked on to account for how an utterance coveys meaning in context. However, the researcher has limited the study to The Punch newspaper because of time and space constraints. Also, only eight (8) interviews will be used for the analysis, because this is the much that will be conveniently accommodated by this kind of research.

1.5   RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

In this essay we will carry out a selective analysis of four (4) political interviews treating different political issues. In these interviews, two (2) interviews will be chosen from each newspaper making a total of eight (8) interviews. Normally political interviews in this selected newspaper are published weekly. Therefore, the research work will make use of interviews published in four consecutive weeks, those published on the 3rd, 10th, 17th , 27th July, 2010. These data will be analyzed using pragmatic approach and elements. The concern of this work shall be how language is used for communication in the interviews selected.

 

Keywords:A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH)



[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]

[alert style=”warning”]NOTE: INSTANT DOWNLOAD SERVICE [/alert]

Have you made payment for this project? If YES, Get a Download Code by contacting our Customer Care.

For further enquiries, call our Hotlines: (+234) 0816-531-2322, 0811-998-2823

[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]

PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS | HIRE A WRITER | HOW TO PAY FOR PROJECT

Keywords: A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INTERVIEWS IN A SELECTED DAILY NEWSPAPER (THE PUNCH)