This study,ASPECTS OF KOENOEM VERB PHRASE contains concise information that will serve as a framework or guide for your project work. The project study is well-researched for academic purposes and are usually provided in complete chapters with adequate References.
Keywords:ASPECTS OF KOENOEM VERB PHRASE
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
e – empty category
i – co-referentiality
t – trace
– rewrite rule
θ – theta
Ap – Adjectival phrase
‘ – Intermediate level
A – Adjective
Adv – Adverb
Deg – Degree
Agr – Agreement
Cp – complementizer phrase
C – complementizer
Det – Determiner
PP – prepositional phrase
P – preposition
Np – Noun phrase
N – Noun
Vp – Verb phrase
V – verb
Spec – Specifier
T – Tense
Ip – Inflectional phrse
I – Inflection
Fp – Focus phrase
F – Focus
Qm – Question marker
Rel – Relative pronoun
/ / – Phonemic symbol
[ ] – Phonetic bracket
[ ̀ ] – High tone
[ ́ ] – Low tone
˜ – Nasality
[ ] – Square bracket or labeled bracket
TABLE OF CONTENT
List of Symbols and Abbreviation
Table of Content
CHAPTER ONE: THE KOENOEN LANGUAGE & ITS SPEAKERS
- General Introduction
1.1 Historical background of the Koenoem Speakers
- Socio-Cultural Profile
- Marriage Divorce/Rites
- Administrative System
- Geographical Location
- Educational Background
- Introduction to Genetic Classification of Koenoem Language
- Scope and organization of the Study
- Theoretical Framework
- Data Collection and Analysis
- Data Analysis
- Brief Review of the chosen Framework
- X-Bar Theory
- Projection Principle
- The Principle and Head Parameter
- Theta Theory
- Case Theory
- Binding Theory
- The Anaphors
- Referential Expression
- Bounding Theory
- Control Theory
- Government Theory
CHAPTER TWO:THE PHONO-SYNTAX OF KOENOEM
2.1 Sound Inventory
2.1.1 Consonants of Koenoem Language
- Distribution of Koenoem Consonant Sounds
- Vowels of Koenoem Language
- Distribution of Koenoem Language
- Tone System in Koenoem Language
- The Syllable Structure in Koenoem Language
- Lexical Categories in Koenoem Language
- Common Nouns
- Concrete Nouns
- Abstract Nouns
- Proper Nouns
- Countable Nouns
- Uncountable Nouns
- Place Nouns
- Collective Nouns
- Compound Nouns
- Animate Nouns
- Noun Animate Nouns
- Personal Pronoun
- Reflective Pronoun
- Interrogative Pronoun
- Indefinite Pronoun
- Demonstrative Pronoun
- Possessive Pronoun
- Classes of Verb
- Transitive Verb in Koenoem
- Intransitive Verb in Koenoem
- Verb with Sentencial Complement
- Verb with Sentencial Complement in Koenoem
- Auxiliary Verb in Koenoem Language
- Modal Auxilliaries
- Primary Auxilliaries
- Tense in Koenoem Language
- Present Tense
- Past Tense
- Continuous Tense
- Aspect in Koenoem Language
- Adverb of Time
- Adverb of Frequency
- Adverb of Degree
- Adverb of Reason
- Adjective of Colour in Koenoem Language
- Comparison of Adjectives in Koenoem Language
- Basic Word Order in Koenoem Sentences
- Types of Sentences in Koenoem Language
- Simple Sentence
- Compound Sentence
- Complex Sentence
- Functional Classification of Sentences in Koenoem Language
- CHAPTER THREE: VERB PHRASE IN KOENOEM
- Types of Sentences in Koenoem Language
3.1 Verb Phrase and Head Parameter
- Structure of Verb Phrase
- The Structure of the Koeneom Verb Phrase
- Verb Phrase with Noun Phrase as Satellites
- Verb Phrase with Prepositional Phrase as Satellites
- Verb Phrase with Noun Phrase and Prepositional Phrase as Satellite
- Verb Phrase with Adverbial Phrase as Satellites
- The verb Phrases and X-bar Theory
- Verb Serialization
- Serial Verb in Koenoem Language
- Phrase Structure Rules in Koenoem Language
- Phrase-Types in Koenoem Language
- Noun Phrases
- Verb Phrase
- Prepositional Phrase
- Adjective Phrase
- Phrase-Types in Koenoem Language
- Transformational Process
- Focus Construction in Koenoem Language
- Question Formation
- Wit Question
- Yes/No Question
THE KOENOEM LANGUAGE & ITS SPEAKERS
1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION
This study focuses verb phrase in the Koenoem language and its speaker spoken in Shendam local government area of Plateau state.
As an introductory chapter, attempts shall be made to trace the origin, socio-cultural profile, administrative system, religion, geographical location, topography, (life zone) economy, marriage rites, map, genetic classification and the burial rites of the Koenoem people. In this same chapterr, we shall present the organization of the study, theoretical framework together with a review of the chosen theory, data collection and data analysis.
1.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE KOENEOM SPEAKERS
There are contradictory versions about the origins of the Koenoem. Some primary and secondary oral sources assumed monolithic origin for the Koenoem people. However, all these contradictory versions reflect migrations and interrelations.
A popular legend of the Koenoem claimed that they were evidently influenced by the attempt to link their origin to the universal perspective and centres of old civilization. This legend claimed that they migrated from France to their present location for economic reasons. According to the present village head, the Koenoem speakers travelled from far Sudan and settled on in their present abode because of the unlimited economic potentials possessed by the area.
Linguistic consideration strongly points to the fact that all couldn’t have one origin nor came together into central Nigeria, as they do not speak same language. In fact, the different in dialect from one Koenoem group to another further points to the fact that they have distinct origin.
Literally, the word “Koe” means “to” while “noem” means “refuse”. This name emanated from a dispute that ensued between them and their neighbours over a river dividing them. The Koenoem people were the rightful owners of the river but their neighbours were claiming ownership. This is because the river has immense economic benefits.
The Koenoem couldn’t stand akimbo and see themselves being deprived of their inalienable rights, they beseeched terrestrial powers from their ancestors with which most of the neighbouring competitors were struck to death.
The neighbouring town later compromise their stand and left the land for its rightful owner. Till today, the Koenoem people are respected for their traditional prowess.
1.2 SOCIO-CULTURAL PROFILE
The Koenoem people are known for unshakeable peace and unflinching tolerance even with other distinct neighbours. They believed these elements (peace and tolerance) are indispensable for survival and productivity. The puzzle of Koeneom social psychology attracts scholarly interest to examine the binding forces. Other groups are most comfortable with them for their humour, human relations, accessibility, peace and docility. They are identical through joking relations, common facial marks, sharing of foods, traditional and cult consultations, moving together in the market or social occasion and sometimes forging common origin.
The Koenoem people are dominantly traditional worshippers with every families having its own ancestral shrine, town shrines and clan shrines. The intrusion of the colonial masters had propagated Christian religion to the point that, it has more preference today than traditional religion. However, Islamic religion is practiced by only those who are also sons of the soil. The language of worship is Hausa. For the traditional worshippers more allegiance is paid to their kins and cultural cum religious heads.
Festivals are organized to unite their kins from far and near. The chief priest is regarded as the ruler of the tribe only, but without defined territory, ceremonies are some of the arenas for hosting neighbouring groups. Some of the ceremonies are burials, marriages and annual festivals. There is a particular festival celebrated to commemorate the death of their heroes who had fought tirelessly to emancipate them from the shackles of invaders and other forms of oppressions. Others are celebrated after the drop of the first rain. There is also an annual festival celebrated on the 12th December. For this festival, an antelope must be casted to appease the gods.
Agriculture is the mainstay of Koenoem’s economy. The people here are gainfully employed in farming. Commercial and subsistence farming are dominant. Yam, maize, and guinea corn are the major articles of trade. The land has varying proportion of silica, salt, nitrogen and phosphorus. It is alluvial and sticky in the paddy areas and sandy on the uplands. They ensure proper growth of crops. In other words, the boom in agriculture is related to the fertility of the soils. It is pertinent to note here that, farming in this region is of great antiquity. Agricultural produce are sold to buyers from the urban centres.
However, agriculture here doesn’t possess the rich potentialities that belong to it in the other regions. Crops are sold at a give-away prices.
1.2.4 Marriage Divorce/Rites
Marriage is one of the basic necessity in every human society. It is the only formal universal approach to procreation. The Koenoem people like any other tribe have an approach to marriage system. After a marriage proposal has been consented by a girl and her family, the man is expected to pay a bride price. The price is usually bearable because of the stagnant economy of the area. The money is combined with material things like; rapper, traditionally called “shinggida” millet, and local beer for the elders of bride’s family.
The second step is that the groom’s farmland is visited to ascertain his financial status. This is executed without his (Groom) knowledge. Having certified that the groom is financially capable, the next step is introduction of both family and subsequently marriage ceremony.
After the marriage ceremony, the bride is also exposed to different physical fitness exercise to keep her warm for the routine duties ahead of her.
1.2.5 Administrative System
The unit of authority starts from the household under its house-head. The household heads are answerable to the clan head or ward head. They are also answerable to the village head while all the village heads are answerable to the chief who might even be the village head. Titleholders have overlapping roles in the palace, but the most significant ones are the secretary, and the chief security officer. The committed leadership attracted the admiration of Arab and European writers and remarked that:
“they were world famous in governance, better than European, Asian or American systems”. (Filaba, e’tal (2007) Koeneom and Gbagyi sub-groups. Bwari: technoscape publications).
Ibn Batuta, a renowned historian also observed that;
“The negroes posses some admirable qualities. They are seldomly unjust and have a greater abhorrence of injustice than any other people. Their kings shows no mercy to anyone who is guilty of the least act. There is complete security in their country. Neither travelers nor inhabitant in it have anything to fear from robbers or men of violence. They do not confiscate the property of any man…” (Okoye, 1964: 72).
The traditional institution was not corrupt; it protected the weak, dealt with criminals particularly armed robbers and could stop any violent clash. In attempt to account for the semi-autonomous nature of the village groups, some informants simply submitted that they were kingdoms, independent of external control. The traditional name of the king is Long Koeneom.
1.2.6 Geographical Location
Shendam local government is located in Shendam, which is almost 254 kilometres to the South East, uniquely recognized as the lowland because of its geographical low attitude. It’s humid weather can be compared to that of the Federal Capital Territory. The council has a total area of 2,437 square kilometers. The local government area is divided into four administrative districts of Shendam, Dorok, Doka and Piapun. The major occupation of the people is farming, trading, craftwork like pottery and fishing. The area can boast of a reasonable presence of several tourism sites such as Npoll Lake, Jalbang Rocks.
People here derive their livelihood from the environment in similar ways from the environmental wealth and thus have a strong traditional affinities. The most obvious physical features of the area are the topography and drainage with ranges of hills of base granite outcroppings with kurape hill.
The hills protrude through Jos but cut off with plains making it becoming dotted down to the confluence of Kogi state. These hills serve as water heads for river Gurara Uke in Kaduna and Nassarawa states respectively. There are also many patches of densely thick forest of several square kilometers, some of them running along the banks of rivers. The natural environment and the weather opportunities have greatly influenced human habitation in the southern Plateau. The plains are between 500-600 metres above sea level with some hills as high as 900 metres above the sea-level made of older granite and black rocks (Gojeh, Jatau and Mamman, 1998: 24-26).
1.2.8 Educational Background
The Koenoems are fairly educated. Though, the belief that farming is profitable has imprisoned their psyche to nothing but agriculture but, we can say to a considerable degree that a few number of the people are educationally motivated. A survey of some of the primary school around the area reveals that, more children are enrolling in school than ever before. This is a pointer to an educationally potential community.
1.3 GENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF KOENOEM LANGUAGE
Genetic classification is an offshot of genesis while genesis is derived from the word gene (cell). Languages could be genetically related. Language of the world can be divided into certain compartments based on striking similarities. They are genetically classified based on the similarities in their linguistic items. However, language might be similar because they belong to the universal sets, this doesn’t mean that such resemblance can be traced to common origin.
Genetic classification is a sub-grouping of all related languages into genetic nodes (groups of languages in each of which one language is more closely related to the other in that group, than to any language outside the group).
Mumil Rublen (1987: 1) states that “the idea that groups of languages that share certain systematic resemblances have inherited those similarities from a common origin is the basis of genetic classification”.
Genetic classification thus makes two statements. First, it affirms that certain languages are in fact related to each other (i.e. maintains similar ancestral relations). Second, it typifies how the languages are interrelated in the form of a branching diagram.
Koenoem language falls under the category of Niger-Congo family.
1.4 SCOPES AND ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
The ultimate goal of this project is to study the aspect of verb phrase in Koenoem language. Extensive investigation shall be made on verb phrase, the minimum verb phrase, its maximum projection, and functions of verb phrase in Koenoem language and verb phrase in respect to transformational process, which involve modification of constituents.
This long essay is conveniently divided into five chapters. The first is an introductory chapter which will encompass the general introduction of this research work, the historical background, socio-cultural profile of the speakers, administrative system, economy, geographical location, topography, educational system, marriage rites and burial system. Chapter one also has in its fold; scope and organization of the study, data collection and analysis, theoretical framework and finally a review of the chosen framework.
Chapter two presents a phonological overview of Koeneom language and basic syntactic concepts like phrase structure rules/components, basic word order, lexical categories and sentence types. Chapter three which is the core or central of this project shall mark out what ‘Verb phrase’ is about in Koenoem language. Chapter three will also delineate the relevant notion of verb phrase and its major sub-categories. Chapter five summaries and make linguistically significant generalizations about Koenoem language.
1.5 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Theories are bundles of abstract representation existing in the linguistic repertoire of a linguist. The relevance of these theories lies in its practical sense. All the levels of language analysis has one or more theories that are capable of exposing the rudiments or fundamentals of such level. “The varieties of approaches to syntax and the grammars on which they depend make this particular level of language probably the most complex and the most contentious in terms of linguistic criticism”… (Geoffrey, Finch 2000: 82). Allied to the above, theories are propounded in order to present a systematic account (or descriptive) of the linguistic knowledge or competence a native speaker possess. Theories in syntax include traditional, classical, structural or taxonomic, systemic and transformational generative grammar.
The theoretical framework to be employed in this research is “government and binding theory”: a sub-theory of transformational generative grammar. Government and binding theory is a model of grammar propounded and developed by Noam Chomsky. This theory has been chosen because it makes universal claims about natural languages i.e. it explains the systems, principles, conditions and rules that are elements or properties of all human languages. Government and binding theory captures the similarities in natural languages by assigning to them the same structure rather than the case of transformational generative grammar.
In essence, verb phrase as an aspect of syntax will be analysed under the GB theoretical framework.
1.6 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Samarin (1967: 43) says “the kind of corpus a field researcher obtains is determined by the purpose and the techniques he adopts in his data collection”. The focus of this research is largely for language description and primarily for showing antonymity or, oppositeness of some utterances with a view to explaining the semantic implication of such in Koenoem-language.
The data is collected through contact or informant method. We obtain linguistic data for this study by making use of a proficient informants from the native community. The Koenoem four hundred wordlist together with a framework techniques are the basic instruments of data-collection. The framework techniques” forms a crucial part of this research work since it is the domain of syntax. It helps an informant to adequately account for both underlying and surface syntactic processes that can’t be captured using the Koenoem four hundred basic lexical items. Three informants tirelessly supply this research work with sophisticated or rich data. Below are pieces of information about them.
- Name: Muhammad Kabir
Age: 56 years
No of years spent in Koeneom: 56 years
Other languages spoken: English, Hausa, Nupe and Igala.
Aspect of the data supplied: Historical background of the Koeneoms
- Name: Musa Taofeek
Occupation: Traditional ruler
No of years spent in Koeneom: 48
Other languages spoken: Hausa, English, Gwarri and Nupe
Aspect of the data supplied: Part of the wordlist and some sentences.
1.7 DATA ANALYSIS
To ensure clarity and brevity of this research, all data supplied by the informants are accurately transcribed. The component words or constituent of the sentences of the language (Koeneom-language) are carefully glossed and subsequently translated. The data collected are strictly worked upon according to native speakers rendition without any permutation, mutilation, modification or imposition of correctness.
1.8 BRIEF REVIEW OF THE CHOSEN FRAMEWORK
Cook (1988: 86) views GB theory “as an interlocking arrangement of principles and sub-theories which interact in many different ways. Horrocks, G (1987, 95) shared a similar opinion”. GB theory is best described as a set of interacting “components”. GB theory carries over certain aspects of the deep structure into the surface structure through the process of transformations or movement technically termed as move-alpha (move – a) according to Andrew Radford, (1988: 419) transformation is the rule that deals with the act of changing the structure of one sentence to another. Transformations are supplementary rules to the phrase structure rules. The output of the phrase structure rules in the input of transformational rules. This theory was developed to correct the lapses of transformational generative grammar.
GB theory captures the similarities which exist between different categories of lexical phrases by assigning the same structure to them rather than having different phrase structure rules for VOS, Adjps, NPs as postulated by transformational generative grammar. Unlike in TGG, GB theory is a modular deductive theory of grammar. The modules of grammar otherwise known as sub-theories, operate in a modular form, i.e. they are interconnected. Below is the modular theory of grammar that confirms the interlocking nature of the GB theory.
MODULAR THEORY OF GRAMMAR
Modules of Grammar
(Adapted from Sells (1985) and Cook (1988).
The above diagram shows that, no part of the GB theory can be considered in isolation from the rest. It posits seven sub-theories viz;
- X – BAR theory
- Theta Ө theory
- Case theory
- Binding theory
- Bounding theory
- Government theory
- Control theory
1.8.1 X – Bar Theory
According to Horrocks, G. (1987: 101), X’ theory provides principles for the projection of phrasal categories from lexical categories and imposes conditions of the hierarchical organization of categories in the form of general schemata. Crucially, it makes explicit the notion “head” of a phrase. Similarly, the x-bar (x’) theory is based on the theory of phrase structure.
In X’ theory, word order (i.e. the syntagmatic arrangement of words) and constituent structure (the relatedness of structures) are paramount. The theory takes into consideration the strict-sub-categorization frame that occurs between verbs and nouns, and generalizes this over other phrasal categories including sentences. The internal structure of each phrasal category e.g. an NP, is similar to others such that the same set of rules can apply to each of them. Thus, we say that the X’ theory uses cross-categorical generalizations. Lamidi, M.T. (2008: 153).
What makes the above possible (according to Lamidi) is the fact that, the phrases have certain features in common. One of these is the concept of head. In PSG, the head is the keyword in a phrase and the word can be pre-or post modified. This concept has been taken over by the X’ theory. The primacy of the head started from the deep structure each head is projected from the D-structure in what is called the projection principle. The principle states that each head must be represented at all levels. There are three categorical levels of X-bar theory viz: lexical, intermediate and phrasal category. The schema below explains better.
In this schema, we take to be a variable representing Noun, Verb Adjective or Preposition, each of which functions as the head of its own phrase. The head is the primary and therefore is X: As an X’, it is a lexical category and it can be pre-modified by a specifier (Spec). It can also be post-modified by a complement or an adjunct. The X-bar theory projects from the core projection level to the maximal projection level. This is called projection principle.
1.8.2 Projection Principle
Chomsky (1981: 29) states that representation at each syntactic level is projected from the lexicon, in that they observe sub-categorisation properties of lexical items: projection principle requires lexical properties to be projected to all levels of syntactic representation i.e. lexical item projects from its zero bar level to one (single) bar level, which is optioned, then to double level the zero bar level is referred to as the core projection level, the single bar level is referred to as the intermediate projection level and the double bar is technically called maximal projection level. The illustration is shown below.
X” Maximal projection level
X’ Intermediate projection level
X0 Core projection level
Another feature that makes generalization possible under the X-bar theory is the concept of head. The notion of head of a phrase is called the principle of head parameter.
1.8.3 The Principle of Head Parameter
The principle of head parameter explains the order of elements in a language the notion of head parameter assumes that the constituent of a phrase may be arranged in different ways. Stowel, (1981: 70) says that the parametric variation between languages according to whether the positions of the head is first or last with respect its complement is to tagged “head parameter” In other words, the “head” in a phrase carries the highest load of semantic information. It is the obligatory part of a phrase. The category to which a phrase falls is strongly determined by the head.
As in the English example: The boyàNPàDet N
Another type of phrase that is permissible within the X-bar is the functional phrase. In X’ theory, a phrase can be headed by non-lexical items (functional word) like determiners, inflections and agreement functional phrases invariably have heads that are linked to functional elements. The functional phrases include inflectional phrases (IP).
IP à Spec I’
I’ à I Comp (VP)
e.g. The house was burgled (A case of passivation)
Det N’ TNS ASP V’
N past better
The house was burgled Øt1
Other functional phrases include complementizer phrase (CP)
CP à Spec C’
C’ à C IP
e.g what is your name
Wh- C IP
Ø Spec I’
Ø I VP
PRST V NP
What is Your name
1.8.4 Theta Theory (Ө Theory)
Ө-theory is concerned with the assignment of what Chomsky calls “thematic’ roles to sentential constituents. The Greek letter theta is a form of shorthand for thematic, thematic roles is similar to semantic roles e.g. roles such as agent, patient, (or theme), beneficiary etc. it is assumed that these are assigned to the complements of lexical items as a lexical property. Kirsten (1991: 493) states that Ө-theory deals with the functional relationship between a predicate and its argument. A predicate is said to assign theta-role to each of its arguments e.g. the NP complement (Direct object) is assigned the role of patient and the PP complement the role of location while the subject NP or the sentence is assigned the agent role. The main principle of Ө-theory is the Ө-criterion which requires each thematic role to be uniquely assigned; i.e. each constituent denoting an argument is assigned just one Ө-role and each Ө-role is assigned just one argument denoting constituent e.g.
Sola cooks in the kitchen
NP I VP
N’ TNS V’
AGENT0 PRST V PP
P’ Det N’
LOCATION P N’ PATIENT
Sola cooks in the kitchen
In the above, the verb phrase assigns the role of an agent to “Sola” (subject NP), the role of agent was also assigned to the object NP by the verb phrase.
1.8.5 Case Theory
Ore, Yusuff (1988: 26), case has to do primarily with the forms that NPs take in different syntactic environments. For English, Yoruba and many Kwa languages, the concept is not readily demonstrable because these languages do not vary the NPs or N-head forms, according to Horrocks (1987: 102) case theory deals with the principle of case assignment to sentential constituents. Chomsky assumes that all NPs with lexical content are assigned (abstract) case. Kristen (1991: 496) states that “case theory regulates the distribution of phonetically realized NPs by assigning abstract case to them. Case is assigned by a set of case assigners to the governed. Horrock (1987: 103) further noted that, the basic idea is that case is assigned under government, the choice of case being determined by the governor in any given example. Government is a traditional notion involving the delimitation of the sphere of influence of a particular category with respect to adjacent categories for instance, NP subject is assigned nominative by INFL, verb assigns accusative case to the object of the verb while preposition assigns oblique case to it object. The following exemplifies the case-system in English
Nominative à subject NP
Vocative à calling NP
Accusative à object NP
Genitive à NP object OF
Dative à NP object of TO
Ablative à NP object of in/on
Subject He she it
Object of V him her it
Obj of prep him her it
Genitive his her its
Adapted from one, Yussuf (1998: 27)
Case assignment to the NP complements of a lexical head is straightforward, and entirely traditional. Accusative or objective case will be assigned in English to any NP governed by V or P but no NPs governed by N or Adj. Prepositions assign oblique case.
1.8.6 Binding Theory
The binding theory is one of the most important constructs in the system. It is primarily concerned with the conditions under which NPs are interpreted as co-referential with other NPs in the same sentence. For the purpose of the binding theory NPs that are arguments are assumed to fall into one of the three categories listed below:
- Referential expressions
1.8.7 The Anaphors
These are NPs whose reference is necessarily determined sentence-internally and which cannot have independent reference. In English reflexive and reciprocal pronouns fall into this class e.g. ‘Herself’ must be taken as referring back the individual denoted (female) in a sentence.
e.g. The girl projected herself well
These are NPs that specific lexical content and have only the features person, number, gender and case; unlike anaphors, they may either refer to individuals independently or co-refer to individuals already named in a given sentence. E.g. the pronominal “He” may refer to an individual mentioned.
In a sentence or some other individuals not mentioned at all: example I and II illustrate this:
- Noam Chomsky says he is a genius. ((He refers to individual
denoted in the sentence)
- Noam Chomsky believes him to be genius (Him referring to
individual not denoted in the sentence).
1.8.9 Referential Expressions
(R. expressors) as the name implies are noun phrases with lexical hands which potentially refer to something. Co-reference is excluded here.
e.g. Tunde says Tunde must be promoted
The same name is used twice, the most natural interpretation is one where two different people are involved as above. However, referentiality is also possible in a limited case.
The locations of antecedents that count for binding theory are defined in three binding principles. Viz:
- Anaphors must be bound in their local domains
- Prenominals must be free in their domain
- Referential expressions must also be free.
The term bound is based on the principle. A simply refers to the conjunction of C. command and co-indexing. Thus a binds b: if and only if
- a c- commands B
- a and B are co-referential
In principle B, the terms free simply means not bound. Principle C refers to elements such as names and other referential noun phrases, Horrocks (1978: 111, 112, 113).
1.8.10 Bounding Theory
Horrocks (1978: 128), states that, bounding theory is concerned with the limitation to be placed on the displacement of constituents by the transformational rule schema move a and its chief principle is subjacency may best be thought of as a criteria property of move a. movement rule within GB theory is assumed to involve three things viz:
A an extraction site
B A landing site
C an intervening gap
Landing site Intervening gap Extraction Site
Figure 2: The diagram of bounding theory
Here, move-a is defined as move any constituent from anywhere to land somewhere. The original position of alpha before movement is called an in-situ position. The diagram below exmplifies this.
X a Y
The diagram says move any element, which is represented with (a), from its in-situ position regardless of variable x and y to the left right, beginning or end of a phrase or sentence.
The basic idea advanced by bounding theory is that no movement can move an element too far.
1.8.11 Control Theory
This theory posits that, transformational analysis of sentences with verbs taking infinitival complements that have null subjects understood as being co-referential with an NP in the man clause will be abandoned in favour of an analysis employing interpretative rules. Similarly, it is concerned with the way in which subjectless infinite structures are construed. It focuses on an element called PRO, sometimes called “big PRO” to contrast it with PRO. PRO is restricted to the subject position in non-finite clauses.
I wanted to go
In the example above, there are reasons to believe that there is really a subject to the clause ‘to go’ but the subject is invisible. PRO can only appear in the subject position of non-finite clauses; it is banned from all object position and from the subject position of finite clause as there is no governor for its position.
1.8.12 Government Theory
Government theory has a role to play in several other sub-theories of universal grammar. According to Chris, U. (2000: 140) the theory is concerned with the relationship between a head and its complements. It also defines the relationship in other sub-theories. It establishes the set of items that may govern other items, and the second is to delimit the sphere of influence of those items. Let us assume that, the set of governors comprises lexical heads of phrases, IFNL [+ tense] and poss [the abstract element in NPs that governs and assigns possessive or genitive case to their subjects. Following Chomsky (1986b) and Sells, (1985), we define government theory thus:
“a governs β if a m-commands (= maximally commands) β (i.e. if a and β share the same maximal projection) and there is no , a barrier for β, such that excludes a. a is a governor if a is an X’ in the X-bar system (e.g. N, V, A, P, INFL)”
The X’ governors (i.e. Noun, verb, adjective, preposition) are lexical items which can function as the head of a construction. The INFL, though not a lexical item is a governor because it assigns nominative case to the subject NP. There is a close relationship between theta role assignment, case marking and principle of government as the configuration in the following figure shows:
+ Tense V PP
V NP P
V NP P NP
Governs governors governs
From the foregoing, the verb sub categorizes for its object as well as assigns Ө-role to both the subject and the object NPs. For case assignment [+ Tense] INFL assign nominative case to [NP, VP] and the preposition assigns oblique case to [NP, PP]. In the same way, INFL governs the subject NP, the verb governs the object NP etc.
Keywords: ASPECTS OF KOENOEM VERB PHRASE
[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]
[alert style=”warning”]NOTE: INSTANT DOWNLOAD SERVICE [/alert]
Have you made payment for this project? If YES, Get a Download Code by contacting our Customer Care.
[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]