This study,ASPECTS OF NOUN PHRASE IN KURAMA LANGUAGE contains concise information that will serve as a framework or guide for your project work. The project study is well-researched for academic purposes and are usually provided in complete chapters with adequate References.
Keywords:ASPECTS OF NOUN PHRASE IN KURAMA LANGUAGE
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Cp Complementizer Phrase
[ei] Empty Category
FP Focus Phrase
GB Government and Binding
IP Inflectional Phrase
NP Noun Phrase
P P reposition
PP Prepositional Phrase
VP Verb Phrase
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.0 General Background
1.1 Historical Background
1.2 Geographical and Socio-Cultural Profile
1.2.1 Social Groupings and Emblems
1.2.2 Culture and Tradition
1.2.5 Mode of Dressing
1.2.6 Political System
1.2.7 Socio-Linguistic Profile
1.3 Genetic Classification
1.4 Scope of Study
1.5 Organization of Study
1.6 Theoretical Frame Work
1.7 Data Collection
1.8 Data Analysis
1.9 Brief Review of the Chosen Framework
1.9.1 X-Bar Theory
1.9.2 Theta Theory
1.9.3 Binding Theory
1.9.4 Control Theory
1.9.5 Government Theory
1.9.6 Case Theory
1.9.7 Bounding Theory
CHAPTER TWO: BASIC PHONOLOGICAL AND SYNTACTIC CONCEPTS
2.1 The Sound System of Kurama Language
2.1.2 The Classification, Description and Place of the Vowel Sound
2.2 Tonal Inventory of Kurama Language
2.3 Basic Syntactic Concepts
2.3.1 Phrase Structure Rules
2.3.2 Lexical Categories
18.104.22.168 Noun Phrase
22.214.171.124 Verb Phrase
126.96.36.199 Prepositional Phrase
188.8.131.52 Adjectival Phrase
184.108.40.206.1 Personal Pronouns
220.127.116.11.2 Possessive Pronouns
18.104.22.168.3 Reflexive Pronouns
22.214.171.124.4 Relative Pronouns
126.96.36.199.4 Interrogative Pronouns
2.4 Basic Word Order
2.5 Sentence Types
2.5.1 Simple Sentence
2.5.2 Compound Sentence
2.5.3 Complex Sentence
CHAPTER THREE: NOUN PHRASE OF KURAMA LANGUAGE
3.1 Satellite of the Noun
3.2 Noun Phrases in Kurama
- 2.1 Position of Noun within the NP
3.2.2 Modification of NP by Adjective
3.2.3 Modification of NP by Determiner
3.2.4 Modification of NP by Preposition
3.3 Functions of Noun Phrase
3.3.1 Noun Phrase as the Subject of the Sentence
3.3.2 Noun Phrase as Direct Object of the Sentence
3.3.3 Noun Phrase as an Indirect Object
3.3.4 Noun Phrase as a Compliment of Preposition
CHAPTER FOUR: TRANSFORMATIONAL PROCESSES
4.1 Focus Construction
4.1.1 Subject – NP Focusing
4.1.2 Direct object – NP Focusing
4.2.1 Subject – NP Relativization
4.2.2 Object – NP Relativization
4.2.3 Indirect Object – NP Relativization
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.0 GENERAL BACKGROUND
This is a long essay on the noun phrase of kurama language. It is aimed at describing the structure of noun phrase of the language under Government and Binding syntax. Kurama language is a language spoken in Lere local government Area of Kaduna State. The tribe known generally as the Kurama, but who themselves the Akurmi (Sing. Bukurmi), or forest people, are situated to the north and north-west of the Katab in the Zaria province. They number between 11,000 and 12,000 persons and are administered by the Emir of Zaria.
The study opens with an introduction and focuses on the Historical background of Kurama, its social grouping and emblems, its socio-cultural profile, geographical location and genetic classification. It also covers the scope and organization of study, theoretical frame work, data collection, procedures data analysis and the brief review of the chosen framework.
1.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
According to Meek (1931), the kurama speakers claim a traditional connection with Kano, and in proof of this claim assert that the Kurmi market at Kano derived its name from them (viz. the Akurmi). The more learned among them, i.e. those most influenced by contact with Muslims, profess to be able to trace the wandering on the tribe back to the time when they dwell at Medina.
In later days, they were subject to ancient kingdom of Zaria, and during the days when Zaria fell under the influence of Kebbi and Songhai, the Kurama suffered at the hands of the Kebbawa who raided the district annually for slaves. They are also raided frequently by the Ningi in the nineteenth century. The Kurama are “playmates” with the people of Kano, and with the Kanuri, but whether this is due to any close association in the past cannot now be determined. What is certain is that the Kurama belong linguistically to the classifying group of The Sudanic division i.e. to the so-called Semi Bantu speaking group of the Nigerian middle belt zone.
1.2 GEOGRAPHICAL AND SOCIO-CULTURAL PROFILE
The Kurama people or speakers are found in Lere local government area of Kaduna State of Nigeria. The kurama people are located at the Garu-Kurama district. The line is Southeastern part of Kaduna state, North of Damakasuwa and South from Kumana.
According to Crozier (1976), Kurama language belong to Benue Congo, eastern Kainji and Northern Jos. 220(NAT 1949), 2,000 (STL 1973).
Kurama is along Kaduna/Jos road. From Jos, it is 140 km and from Kaduna, it is 250 km.
1.2.1 SOCIAL GROUPINGS AND EMBLEMS
According to oral history, the Kurama consist of a number of exogenous divisions wholly or partially localized. Thus the small clan of the Kamau is wholly localized at the village – area of Guru, whereas sections of the Abisi clan are to be found at a number of different village areas. Viz Garu, Srubu, Damakasua, and Kudaru. It appeared that in some instances a number of exogamous units share a common title and a common emblem, but that intermarriage between the units is permissible.
The Har Asre, for example consist of the following sub-divisions, all of which respect the crocodile (1) Koranga
A Koranga man may not marry a Koranga woman, but he may marry a woman of any of the other subdivisions with the exception of Kipiri, the koranga and kipiri consider themselves to be related through a common forefather, a relationship which cannot now be demonstrated genealogically. It would seem, therefore, that the Asare at one time constituted a single exogamous clan, but that with the increase or spread of the clan exogamy was replaced by a local exogamy.
There are numerous other kurama clans (e.g. the Asa, Asana, Bisawa, Awai, Akurgi, Nargi, Gurya, etc)
1.2.2 Culture and Tradition
The Kurama people are largely enriched with traditional practices, which are often reflected in their various exogamous groups.
Firstly, the Arerus appear to respect the cock (Bugwara). It was stated according to my informant that, if the husband of an Areru woman had a cock cooked in the compound, he had subsequently to purify the place where it had been cooked by sweeping it with the leaves of the locust bean and shea trees.
Secondly, an Asare can play fearlessly with a crocodile; it is regarded as a relative to the Asare. If an Asare man sees the corpse of a crocodile he must dig a grave for it and bury it reverently, pushing the corpse into the grave with sticks.
The normal mode of obtaining a wife was, and is, by agricultural service plus cash and other payment to the girl’s parents or guardians. The scale of payment of service of obtaining a wife was as follows:
- An initial services extending over ten years, equal to the amount of work performable by three men for three days each year on the farm of the girl’s father, and for one day on that of the girl’s mother.
- A bride-price of 40,000 – 60,000 cowries.
- 2,000 cowries, one basket of rice, guinea corn, one goat, four chickens and one pot of honey. These gifts were given during the concluding rites.
Few inquiries were made on the subject of religion. Muhammadanism is spreading, and those who have not embraced it practice a lackadaisical form of ancestor worship in which as so often among the semi-Bantu speaking tribes, the bull roerer (Makili) plays a prominent part. Noteworthy points are that, although women never resort to the ancestral graves, men perform their rites at the graves of female ancestors as well as of male.
1.2.5 Mode of Dressing
According to oral history, the Kurama people dress like the Hausa people. In
the olden days, wools were woven to make strapless tops for the men who cover their private parts with animal skin. Wools are also woven for the women to make a long but not wide piece to cover their breasts. The females also cover with leaves from a tree, which looks like palm trees.
1.2.6 POLITICAL SYSTEM
Governance of Kurama
They practice traditional system of governance, where there is an exogamous and social group which is recognized as the chieftain whose duties are religious and social rather than political (the political chieftainship being purely a local matter), it is his business to settle individual and family disputes and allay ill-feeling within the kindred or clan. In addition to the clan or extended families who exercise a social authority not merely over their own households but over those of all younger brothers, cousins, and children.
1.2.7 SOCIO-LINGUISTIC PROFILE
Olaoye (2002: 98) defines socio-linguistic as “the study of various social, political, cultural and linguistic situations within a given speech community that give how language choice and use reveal the values, cultural beliefs and practices of the community”. This shows that cultural beliefs, way of life etc cannot be separated from language. In other words, language and culture are inseparable bound.
Most Kurama speakers including the younger generation are bilingual. The older generations are not quite fluent in Hausa as the younger generation who through education hold position in administration and public services including the police. Through education, the younger generations speak two or more languages i.e. Kurama, Hausa and English language making them bilingual.
1.3 GENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF KURAMA LANGUAGE
According to Comrie (1990), genetic classification is a sub-grouping of all relevant languages into genetic nodes. Kurama is under the Benue-Congo language family.
Afro Asiatic Niger Kordofonian Nilo Sahara Khoisan
Niger Congo Niger Kordofonian
Mande Gur Kwa Benue-Congo Adamawa West
Isam Kumana Biron Junkun Kurama
1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY
This particular work focuses its attention on the formation of noun phrase in the Kurama language. The description will also delve on some of the peculiar features of the language. This research is expected to add to the linguistic finding on Kurama language.
1.5 ORGANISATION OF STUDY
This research work has five chapters. Chapter one is the introduction covering the historical background, socio-cultural and socio-linguistic profile of Kurama language and its speakers as well as the genetic classification, scope and organization of study, including theoretical framework, data collection, data analysis and a brief review of the chosen framework. Chapter two focuses on the basic syntactic concepts which include phrase structure rules, lexical categories basic word order and the sentences Types. Chapter three focuses on the aspect of noun phrase in Kurama language, chapter centers on the transformational processes of the language. Chapter five concludes the research work.
1.6 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The theoretical framework adapted in this research work is the theory of Government and Binding.
1.7 DATA COLLECTION
The data for this research were collected using the language informant to elicit the data. The Ibadan word list of (400) four hundred basic items is used for the collection.
The data were collected through direct interviews with the informants or
language helper with the use of Ibadan wordlist which contains items that are illuminating and capable of making linguistically significant generalizations.
Information concerning the informant used for this research is given below.
NAME: Mr. Benjamin Gwa
AGE: 41 years
LANGUAGE SPOKEN: Kurama, Hausa, English
YEARS LIVED IN GARU Forty-one years
OCCUPATION: Civil Servant
MARITAL STATUS: Married
NAME: Mr. Kenneth
AGE: 69 years
LANGUAGE SPOKEN: Kurama, Hausa, English
YEARS LIVED IN GARU Sixty years
MARITAL STATUS: Married
1.8 ANALYSIS OF DATA TYPE
With the use of the Ibadan wordlist, we were able to collect two hundred and forty-nine (249) nouns, one hundred and twenty nine (129) verbal and twenty-two (22) adjectives. With the help of the native speaker, one hundred and twenty (120) sentences were collected, which include thirty (30) noun phrases, twenty two (22) verb phrases, three (3) examples in subject Noun phrase focusing, three (3) examples on subject noun phrase relativization, three examples on object noun phrase relativization, three (3) examples on simple sentences, four examples on compound sentences and three examples on complex sentences.
1.9 BRIEF REVIEW OF THE CHOSEN FRAMEWORK
The Government and Binding theory (GB) was proposed by Noam Chomsky (an American Linguist) and the work was published in 1981. The modules are derived from theory of Universal Grammar, which posit multiple levels of representation related by the transformational rule (Move ) Cook (1988:28).
Some parts of these syntactic models have been modified by Chomsky (1986), and a host of other linguists like Cook (1988), Heageman (1991). Government and binding theories is an interlocking arrangement of sub-theories, which interact in many different ways that no party of the theory can be isolated from the rest. The sub-theories are:
- X-bar theory
- Theta theory
- Case theory
- Binding theory
- Bounding theory
- Control theory
- Government theory
1.9.1 THE X-BAR THEORY ( – THEORY )
The X-Bar theory defines possible phrase structure configurations in language generally. It provides principles for the projection of phrasal categories from lexical categories and imposes conditions on the mechanical organization of categories in the form of general schemata. Crucially, it makes explicit the notion ‘head of a phrase’.
The central notion is that each of the major lexical categories (noun, verb, preposition, adjectives) is the head of a structure dominated by a phrasal node of the category e.g. noun, noun phrase verb, verb phrase. Cook (1988: 32).
According to Rutledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics (1972), “The term X-bar arises from the notion where one or more bars are placed above the constituents X to represent the level of complexity.
Generative linguists like Welberhuth ( 1995), consider ‘X-bar’ theories as occupying the central posit in syntactic theory. This is due to the fact that all other theories under GB draw in the basic structure that the X-bar makes available.
Chomsky (1986: 12) in the analysis says that, the convention requires that every maximal projection has a specifier of as XP position, with the intermediate bar projection serving as the XP’s core. The core consists of the head Xo and complement (which can be a maximal projection itself). Then, we can say that the maximal projection (X-bar) is another full name for full phrasal category associated with a particular lexical category as the lead of that phrase. This theory is represented by this phrase structure rule.
|X11 set to introduce the categories as X11 seeks to explain and these are the lexical intermediate and phrasal categories.|
Under transformational generative grammar (TG) the phrase structure rule was:
S NP AUX VP
Under GB, the phrase structure rule is as follows: –
CP SPEC C1
C1 C1 IP
IP SPEC I1
I1 I VP
I Tns Agr
VP spec V1
V1 V (NP) (PP)
X11 in the schema above is believed to be a variable representing noun, verb, adjectives or preposition each of which functions as the head of its own phrase. The head is primary and there is Xo. It is also a lexical category and it can be post-modified by a specifier (spec). The lexical head can project to the intermediate category (X1) though the addition of a complement. Furthermore, the X (X-Single bar) in conjunction with the specifier projects further to X11 (X-double). E.g. in a sentence like, “The publisher of the book” will be phrase marked like this:
Det N pp
The Publisher P1
of spec N1
The head of the phrase is N1 (publisher) and P1 is its compliment. The compliment defines the head and without the meaning or publisher is incomplete.
1.9.2 THE THETA THEORY (Ѳ-THEORY)
This is a term that mediates thematic roles and their syntactic realization as
specific argument of a predicate. This theory says ‘that one argument must correspond to each thematic role and vise versa that is, an NP must correspond to each thematic role. (Chomsky, 1986:4)
Argument in this case refers to a noun phrase, which could appear in two form i.e the subject or object position of a verb. The object is further divided in two parts, which are the direct and indirect objects, e.g.
Adeoti újana újyáu Jumoke
Adeoti buy bag Jumoke
“Adeoti bought a bag for Jumoke”
‘Adeoti bought a bag for Jumoke’
Subject Direct object indirect object
The thematic criterion also assigns roles to argument. The commonly expressed roles are agent, patient, instrument, locative, goal, source, experiences, benefactive.
- Agent: The investigator of some action e.g.
Ada úwe Tola
Ada kill Tola
Ada killed Tola
‘Ada’ is the investigator of the action.
- Patient Entity undergoing the effect of some action
Bola údákú uyàh
Bola fall over
Bola fell over
‘Bola’ is the one undergoing the effect.
- Instrument: means by which something comes about
e.g. Dapo Úgwíyá Demi nú Àddáh
Dapo wounds Demi with cutlass
‘Dapo wounded Demi with cutlass’
‘A cutlass’ in this case serves as a means by which Demi was wounded.
- Locative: place in which something is situated or takes place e.g.
Bimbo sagan takar Ùrén úti
Bimbo hide book under tree
‘Bimbo hide book under tree, “under the tree is the location.
- Goal: Entity towards which something moves e.g.
Sogo úni újyáu Funmi
Sogo give bag Funmi
‘Sog gave the bag to Funmi’
‘to Funmi is the Goal’
- Source: Entity from which something moves
e.g. Tolu return from Europe
Tolu mi avu Vwavo
Tolu returned from Europe
‘from Europe is the source’.
- Experience: Entity experiencing some psychological state e.g.
Toyin wang winu
Toyin is die
Toyin is dead
‘Toyin is the experiencer.
- Benefactor: Entity benefiting from some action
e.g. Moji ùjaná ùkyaútà Biodun
Moji buy gift Biodun
‘Moji bought a gift for Biodun.
Biodun is the benefactor.
The notation Ѳ is called the semantic properties assigned by head thematic roles (Ѳ roles). The lexical entry for a verb needs to specify the Ѳ role that goes with it. In the sentence analyzed below, Ѳ-roles are specified.
Akin ingasa Ife nu owata
Agent Patient location
Example in Yoruba language.
Akin pe Ife ni ile
Agent Patient location
Example in English language.
Akin called Ife at home
Agent patient location
It is important to state that the precise formulation of the theta criterion is only possible by referring to them.
1.9.3 BINDING THEORY
According to the Linguistic Encyclopedia (1991: 2), Binding theory is concerned with the syntactic domain in which NPS can or cannot be related to another NP by being co-referential in the sentences.
Binding theory is one of the most important constructs in the system. It is concerned primarily with the condition under which NPs are interpreted as co-referential with other NPs in the same sentence e.g. “Wonder woman projected herself into the 24th Century”. Herself must be taken as referring to the individual denoted by wonder woman.
“Binding theory is concerned with the categories that must be bound and free in defining the domain in which binding takes place” (Horrocks 1987: 2). For the purpose of binding theory, NPS that act as arguments are assumed to fall into one of the three categories listed below.
- Anaphors (b) pronouns (c) referential expressions.
ANAPHORS: these are NPs whose reference is necessarily determined sentence – internally and which cannot have independent reference. In English, reflexive and reciprocal pronouns fall into this class e.g herself, himself, ourselves etc.
e.g. Tope intaré ná na intaré ná
Tope loves herself he loves himself
PRONOMINALS: pronominals are NPs that lack specific lexical content and have only the features, persons, number, gender and case, unlike anaphors. They may either refer to individuals independently or co-refer to individuals already named in a given sentence e.g. Tope says she is a genius. “she” may refer to the individual denoted by the name “Tope” or some other individual not mentioned in the sentence.
REFERENTIAL EXPRESSIONS: This is otherwise known as R-expression as its name implies are noun phrase with lexical ability to potentially refer to something co-reference here is excluded. E.g. Big Jim says Tiny Tim should be boiled in oil. Even where the same name is used twice, the most natural interpretation is one where two different people are involved.
“Bola says Demilade must be promoted”.
It must however, be admitted that co-referentially is here a possibility, but the sentence so interpreted is stylistically highly ‘marked’, revealing something of the speaker’s attitude.
1.9.4 CONTROL THEORY
Control theory is the transformational analysis of sentence with verbs taking infinitival complements that have null subjects understood as being co-referential with an NP in the main clause.
Trask (1993: 62) defined control as module of grammar that deals with the phenomenon of a verb phrase complement that has no overt subject and consequently interpreted. Semantically as having some determiner phrase (DP) appearing somewhere within the sentence or an arbitrary (unspecified). Determiners phrase that function as its “subject” or “controller”. A non-overt subject DP of the infinitival clause is technically represented within the GB framework by a distinct ‘empty category’ called – PRO.
According to Riemsdijk and Willams (1983: 132) “the abbreviation PRO has been devised to stand for a phonetically null pronoun that occupies the subject position of infinitives in control theory” it can be exemplified with the Kurama sentence in the following:
- Tunde intare wi uma bazeh
Tunde wants that he leave
“Tunde wants that he leave”
(Tunde intare (PRO na uma bazeh)
(Tunde wants 9pro to leave).
(The PRO here is also subject controlled.
1.9.5 GOVERNMENT THEORY
Government theory deals in essence with the relationship between a head and its complement and it also describes relationship in other sub-theories.
According to Yusuf (1986: 141) “Government is a primitive concept, in that it is a long fact of grammar that a verb governs its object (where the object could be NP, PP) and while the pre-post position govern its object also”. This implies that verbs such as sing, dance, kill, draw, explain etc. govern their (NP) object. Also, where preposition is found often an HP follows giving rise to the statement that a preposition governs its NP objects.
Chomsky (1986: 17) says of an empty category that “a non-prominal empty category must be properly governed. This implies that PRO; a prominal category is exempted from government their for Chomsky defined proper government as: “β’ is properly governed by ‘α’ if it is governed by ‘α’ and a certain kind of connection holds between ‘α’ and ‘β’. He further said that ‘α’ properly govern ‘β’, if ‘α’ governs ‘β’ or antecedents governs ‘β’. The configuration of government is as follows:
In the configurations, ‘α’ governs ‘β’ and ‘y’ are sisters to ‘α’, ‘β’ can C-command ‘y‘ and ‘y’ can C-command ‘β’ i.e they govern each other. Government can be recognized if they are adjacent. Furthermore, it should be noted from the explanation above that government is some kind of c-command, that the governor is not a phrasal category, it is a lexical category in the set of N,V,P,A and I. Government is distinct from c-command, it is not a cases of mutual relationship. Also, the domain of government is much in narrower scope than c-command.
It is important to note that adjacency, namely, contiguity, is required for government and that there must be no blocking categories lexical or phrasal between the governor and the governee (of case assignment)
In ùjána liamtò Bola
I buy pot for Bola
I bought a pot for Bola
In the sentence above, the verb ‘bought’ governs the NP ‘a pot’ ‘PP governs the NP Bola’. The verb ‘bought’ could not govern the ‘I’ because there is INFL in between them assigning a case to the pronoun I and government cannot take place if there is a blocking category.
The illusion of case government by Sells (1985: 41) is shown below:
1.9.6 THE CASE THEORY
According to Kristen (1991: 86) case theory regulates the distribution of phonetically realized NPs by assigning abstract case to them. “it is assigned by a set of case assigners to the constituent they govern”. Yusuf (1986: 26) says, “Case has to do, primarily with the forms that NPs take in different syntactic environment”. With the definitions above, case provides condition of well-formedness in a given syntactic structure configuration.
In Government and Binding theory, the case are said to be assigned under Government as:
- Nominative case is a assigned by tense ‘INFL’
- Accusative case is a assigned by verb.
- Oblique case us assigned by preposition e.g.
NP I VP
Bola Tns Agr Spec V1
V NP PP
Uni a takar P N
Nouns or adjectives do not assign any case. Furthermore, on the assignment of case, all noun phrases that have phonetic content must have case or else they are ill formed. This corollary is known as the case filter which is only detachable in the phonetic form. Case filter states that any NP without a case assigned should not filter out.
e.g. ( Infl – A )
- a) Ma Ujana mota Bola
I buy car for Bola
I bought a car for Bola
Noun Accusative oblique
Case case case
- b) Ma ujana Bola mota
I buy Bola car
“I bought Bola a car” dative shift
The case filter in this case says, any NP without a case assigned be filtered out. Finally, the case theory recognizes two case assignment.
- Inherent case assignment that is assigned at the deep structure level.
- Structural /Abstract: case assignment is at the surface structural level. (Cook, 1988: 87)
1.9.7 BOUNDING THEORY
Bounding theory is concerned with the way movement rule (move α) can be constructed. In essence, it deals with the limitation to be placed on the displacement of constituents by the transformational rule ‘Move – α).
Movement rule within the GB theory is assumed to involve:
- An extraction site (ii) A landing site (iii) An Intervening gap.
- Landing site Intervening site Extraction site
The basic idea, according to Cook (1996: 258), to be captured by bounding theory is that no movement can move an element too far. This requires a principle of some kind to limit movement in the required way. Chomsky (1973) proposed the principle of subjacency, which stipulates that no movement can move an element over more than one bounding node at a time.
Keywords: ASPECTS OF NOUN PHRASE IN KURAMA LANGUAGE
[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]
[alert style=”warning”]NOTE: INSTANT DOWNLOAD SERVICE [/alert]
Have you made payment for this project? If YES, Get a Download Code by contacting our Customer Care.
[divider height=”30″ style=”default” line=”default” themecolor=”1″]